As the concept, Liberal, takes care of two liberal sources – even so its amplitude is not measurable only in such dualidade -, first between the conservatives, following a continuity line politics, favorable the advantages of a lasting power and a permanence with intention to keep the order, distanciado of the reformador ideal, considered for the conservadorismo as anarchic, beyond being associates the considered theoreticians disturbing of the order, Rousseau and Voltaire were examples of authors repudiated in the cycle conservative. In the reformador direction, the Liberal concept is come back the subjugation of the citizen to a monarch, not having considered the capacity of the individual in taking decisions, as well as, choosing its representatives of form conscientious, enjoying of its public freedom, favoring the press freedom a posteriori, even so the press has been divulgadora of the ideology of both the groups. The third concept of the triad, called Liberalism, also serves the dichotomy politics, bringing in the bulge the French Revolution and diverse other transformations that had become longed for it and repudiated. Liberalism conservative considered the people subject to the power of the monarch, being free when submitting itself it such moderadora authority, considering a priori a dinstica priority, what it sends to us logical hobbesiana to it of abdication on behalf of the sovereign power, leaving of the premise of that the good one must remain. Reformador Liberalism appears granting to the people the power, relegating the monarch the popular will, creating autonomy to the public sphere while detainer of the power politician.
The figure of the monarch is observed in both the sources, creating differentiation in spheres of classrooms where they are subordinated, others subordinate and one third parcel becomes excluded. We have a Liberalism that it searchs to revolutionize without making a revolution in fact, looking for to transform through what he conserves, emancipating without the drastic disruption, where exactly the monarch adopts the new ideals and demonstrates itself until certain point, the opposite its proper origin. As exposition of Lcia author Maria Bastos P. Snows: ‘ ‘ The pincipais values of the culture politics of the world luso-Brazilian then were defined. The main effort was directed in the direction to introduce reforms? more than what to sponsor revolutions. One accepted, therefore, a constitutional monarchy, where the elite of talentos was capable to guide the public opinion; a on freedom to the order; an equality regulated for lei.’ ‘ (SNOWS, 2001:90) One concludes, that Liberalism until sketched a connotation of ‘ ‘ modernidade’ ‘ , but it was not allowed to estrapolar the force of the traditionalistic conservadorismo, that kept the stability of a society in ascension.